<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Good Are You, and UFC 100</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.compatiblepoker.com/poker-rumors/how-good-are-you-and-ufc-100/1652/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.compatiblepoker.com/poker-rumors/how-good-are-you-and-ufc-100/1652</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: RogerCP</title>
		<link>http://www.compatiblepoker.com/poker-rumors/how-good-are-you-and-ufc-100/1652/comment-page-1#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>RogerCP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compatiblepoker.com/poker-rumors/?p=1652#comment-523</guid>
		<description>I still believe it&#039;s overoptimization both with links and onpage including sidebar navi, not one other link is a different anchor text.  

http://www.backlinkwatch.com

Everything is &quot;Best Poker Site&quot;.  This may not get you banned if the site were indexed but it &quot;may&quot; not get you reincluded as they want affiliate sites to be squeaky clean.

Just a thought as to why they might still be reluctant to re-include....I like the site though, nice and clean.

On a side note, I submitted my reinclusion for GS last week so we shall see.

P.S. - Jay, yea right, Sam was just screwing with me, he hits like a train when he&#039;s trying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still believe it&#8217;s overoptimization both with links and onpage including sidebar navi, not one other link is a different anchor text.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.backlinkwatch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.backlinkwatch.com</a></p>
<p>Everything is &#8220;Best Poker Site&#8221;.  This may not get you banned if the site were indexed but it &#8220;may&#8221; not get you reincluded as they want affiliate sites to be squeaky clean.</p>
<p>Just a thought as to why they might still be reluctant to re-include&#8230;.I like the site though, nice and clean.</p>
<p>On a side note, I submitted my reinclusion for GS last week so we shall see.</p>
<p>P.S. &#8211; Jay, yea right, Sam was just screwing with me, he hits like a train when he&#8217;s trying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

